The Best Leaders I Know Don't Lead From the Front. They Clear the Path.
A reflection on servant leadership, focus, and what truly drives transformation
There's a question I've carried with me for most of my career, one that surfaces every time I walk into a new organization: Are people here treated as the greatest asset — or managed as a cost to control?
The answer shapes everything. Culture, velocity, outcomes, retention. I've seen it play out in startups racing to find product-market fit, in Fortune 50 enterprises navigating multi-year transformation programs, and more recently in the fast-moving world of private equity and AI-driven deal intelligence. The organizations that get this right don't just perform better — they feel different from the inside.
I recently had the privilege of sharing some of these reflections with Trisha Hall on Illuminating Insights. The conversation brought me back to a few truths I keep returning to, no matter the industry or stage of growth.
Leadership isn't about authority. It's about environment.
The most powerful thing a leader can do is create the conditions for their team to do their best work. That sounds simple. In practice, it's harder than any technical problem I've ever solved. It requires a leader to check their ego at the door, to stop treating people as interchangeable "resources," and to get genuinely curious about what's slowing the team down.
David Marquet framed this beautifully in his work on intent-based leadership: the shift from leader-follower to leader-leader changes not just decision-making speed — it changes who people believe they are at work. When people feel genuinely empowered, they stop waiting for permission and start solving problems. I've watched this transformation happen in real time, and it never gets old.
When everything is a priority, nothing is.
This might be the most consistent pattern I see in struggling organizations: the inability to focus. There's always one more initiative, one more stakeholder with a competing request, one more "urgent" ask that dilutes the team's energy and erodes trust in leadership.
Henrik Kniberg's work on flow and continuous delivery has shaped how I think about this. Teams don't need more capacity — they need fewer active work streams. Finishing things matters. Momentum is a product of completion, not busyness. When I've helped teams apply lean principles and genuinely commit to finishing before starting, the productivity shift is almost immediate. And more importantly, people feel it. The weight of perpetual incompletion lifts.
This is equally true in the AI product work I'm doing today at CTS Partners. Building ARIA — our AI-native M&A intelligence platform — requires ruthless prioritization across dozens of competing scenarios and stakeholder needs. The teams that move fastest aren't the ones trying to do everything. They're the ones who are crystal clear on the next most important thing, and aligned enough to execute without constant check-ins.
"Momentum is a product of completion, not busyness."
OKRs are only as powerful as the trust underneath them.
I've seen OKRs save organizations and I've seen them become bureaucratic theater. The difference is almost never about the framework. It's about whether leadership is genuinely willing to let go of control and trust the team to own their outcomes.
Marty Cagan has been direct about this: the gap between empowered product teams and feature factories isn't a process gap — it's a trust gap. When leaders use OKRs to micromanage outputs rather than align on outcomes, the framework collapses under its own weight. But when teams have real ownership of their key results, and when leadership's job becomes removing obstacles rather than tracking compliance, something remarkable happens: people start caring about the outcome, not just the metric.
I implemented OKRs from zero at a well-known Fortune 10 bank — aligning 15+ technology business units in under 12 months. The technical work was straightforward. The hard work was convincing senior leaders to let go of the output-tracking habits they'd built over decades. The ones who made that shift saw their teams accelerate. The ones who didn't got compliance theater.
The question I keep asking
Every organization I work with is navigating some version of the same tension: the pressure to move fast versus the need to bring people with you. The leaders who resolve that tension most effectively aren't the ones who move fastest. They're the ones who've created enough trust, focus, and clarity that their teams can move fast without being pushed.
That's what servant leadership actually looks like in practice. Not soft. Not slow. Ruthlessly focused on removing the barriers between talented people and the outcomes they're capable of achieving.
#ServantLeadership #OKRs #ProductLeadership #AIStrategy #IntentBasedLeadership #MindTheProduct
Related Posts
It's Not You. It's the Software.
We've normalized blaming ourselves for bad technology. But the bar for what 'good' looks like has never been lower — and it's time to raise it. A leadership perspective on human-centered design, AI adoption, and the order that still matters.
AI Makes It Easier Than Ever to Produce More Work. But Are We Creating More Value?
AI is dramatically increasing how much work we can produce. But are we creating more value — or just more output? A leadership perspective on outcomes, metrics, and clarity in the age of AI.
AI Adoption Isn't Failing Because of the Technology. It's Failing Because of Us.
Why enterprise AI tools fail within three weeks — and what change management has to do with it.
